Skip to content
6 Comments leave one →
  1. AustinTXGal permalink
    5 December, 2008 21:15

    This information is wrong. Twice Berg’s cases have been thrown out. What is being considered in conference today is Donofrio’s case. It is only in conference, which is where they decide which cases to hear. Only a few out of thousands submitted and considered in conference are actually heard before the Supreme Court. Most scholars say Donofrio’s case has no chance of being actually heard by the Supreme Court.

  2. 5 December, 2008 21:15

    Sorry, but I think you are confusing the two cases. Donofrio’s case is being heard in conference today; Berg’s case will be scheduled for conference soon according to his website. Berg’s case was dismissed in Pennsylvania by Surrick, but has bot been thrown out be anyone else yet. There is another case pending as well filed this week at the SCOTUS by Cort Wrotnowski.

  3. AustinTXGal permalink
    5 December, 2008 21:15

    Thanks for your email about this, cats. I have researched this quite a it and I realize that it was Donofrio’s case that was being heard in conference today…that is exactly what I stated in my first comment. Berg had two cases to the Supreme Court thrown out on November 3rd. You can go to the Supreme Court’s website and see this for yourself.

    I have combed the Supreme Court’s website and online and except for blogs such as this, see nothing that indicates that the Supreme Court is going to hear Berg’s (third?) motion in conference. I have no indication that this is true at all.

    The Wrotnowski case was denied by Justice Ginsberg on 11/26 and refiled on 11/29.

    It is time to give all this up. Obama won. He has produced his birth certificate. The Supreme Court keeps denying hearing this over and over as has several other courts. Find something else to do with your time.

  4. 6 December, 2008 21:15

    from Mr. Berg’s case at

    “In the afternoon, December 1, 2008, Lisa, Mr. Berg’s Assistant contacted the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke with the Clerk. The Clerk informed Lisa Mr. Berg’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari would be distributed to all nine (9) Justices and a conference should be set within ten (10) days.”

    Wrotnowski’s case is also awaiting a date for conference or a dismissal.

    This constitutional issue has validity to some people, so I do not think it a waste of time, just as you did not think it a waste of time to look for information as well.

    Your research has evidently not taken you to any site that debunks the myth that the BC produced on line is authentic. Keep looking.

  5. Laurie Grooman permalink
    6 December, 2008 21:15

    This is the story that just will not go away, despite the MSM’s attempt to bury it in silence.

    SCOTUS conferenced Donofrio’s case yesterday, but I have not heard whether or not they will hear the case.

    It looks as though Berg’s case will be conferenced by Scotus around the 10th or 11th, according to information posted here. Berg’s case was thrown out, once, (to my knowledge) due to lack of standing with the court. but not due to lack of merit. His case has now changed somewhat, as it has become a class action law suit, with state electors agreeing to petition the court to redress this grievance. The electors DO have standing before the court, so the court will not throw it out due to lack of standing this time.

    Wrotowski’s case is another, and I believe that there are two others on the docket with more cases heading towards the SCOTUS.

    Obama could make all of this go away so easily by producing proper documentation. I have read that he has spent over $800,000.00 in legal fees to keep from producing a $10-20 document. WHAT IS HE HIDING???

    The SCOTUS has already received over 1,000,000 letters from concerned citizens asking them to assure the American people that Obama is indeed a legitimate candidate, and meets the requirements for POTUS as set forth in the US Constitution as a “natural born” citizen.

    One other thing: Justice Souter demanded that Mr. Obama provide a legitimate copy of his birth certificate by Dec. 1st. I am unaware if this has happened.

    Can you say “Constitutional Crisis?”

  6. Ted permalink
    7 December, 2008 21:15

    The choice facing the Supreme Court boils down to civil unrest to protect the Constitution or civil war to proceed to ‘inaugurate’ a non-”natural born citizen”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: